End-to-end model for the whole company — three layers, coded and rated for criticality.
One operator, one process model, and an honest number to start from.
A mobile operator in the Gulf asked us to turn how it actually works into a single, governed, measurable process model. We delivered the operating model, the competency map, the governance and measurement frameworks, and a maturity baseline covering close to 500 processes — then gave its executive team one index to manage the gap to.
The idea
Not a document review.A check of whether the document and the desk agree — every process, every unit, through structured interviews with the people who run them.
Level-3 processes baselined for maturity across eleven business units.
Documentation-and-adoption index at baseline — the honest number.
Set by the executive team, tracked by unit on the maturity dashboard.
Fast growth, uneven process. Nobody had the map.
The operator had grown fast and its processes had grown with it, unevenly. Some units ran to documented procedures. Others ran on practice that had never been written down, or on documents that no longer matched what people did. Regulatory obligations — from the national telecom regulator to payment-card security standards — applied to processes nobody could point to on a single map. The executive team wanted three things: one picture of the business as an end-to-end process model, a way to know whether each process was being followed, and a number it could set a target against.
An operating model the whole company fits on one page
Built on the telecom industry's standard framework, adapted to the operator's own value chain: three layers, from strategy and infrastructure through customer-facing operations to enterprise support, decomposed into the familiar telecom flows — lead-to-cash, concept-to-market, the network lifecycle, the supply side, and the functions that hold the rest up. Every process carries a code and a criticality rating, so the model distinguishes the processes that launch products, generate revenue or stand between a customer and an answer from those that merely need to exist.
A competency model: who has to be able to do what
A process model on its own changes nothing. For each level-2 process we mapped the competencies required to execute it — from product and launch management through provisioning, collections and escalation to vendor evaluation and revenue assurance. The operator can now see competency gaps unit by unit, and plan hiring and training around them rather than around org-chart vacancies.
Governance that connects the law to the desk
Three levels: the external regulatory instruments at the top — thirteen bodies for an operator in this market, from the telecom regulator and the central bank to the cybersecurity, data and competition authorities — the executive layer that turns them into compliance requirements, and the units that execute. Worked through end to end on a live example, so anyone in the chain can trace a control back to the requirement that created it.
Measurement that starts from strategy, not from what is easy to count
Process metrics are derived, not collected: from scorecard objective, to the processes serving it, to their performance objectives, to metrics with baselines and targets. A process without a line back to a strategic objective does not get a metric. The cascade runs through three owned levels — strategy office, management, operations — and the data flows back up the same path, so what the board sees is what the floor measured.
We also specified the platform to run it on: a process-management system as the single repository for modelling, approval, measurement and per-process cost, integrated with the operator's dashboards, document management and automation — so the framework lives in the tools people already use, not in a binder.
Worked through on a real scorecard: the consumer chief's revenue objective traces to acquire-to-activate, its performance objectives, and the monthly activation and renewal metrics the teams manage. Every executive can see their scorecard number at the top of the chain and the process metric their teams manage at the bottom.
Six processes in ten were where they should be. The dashboard says exactly where the other four are.
Every one of the 485 level-3 processes was assessed on a five-point scale through structured interviews with designated representatives in each unit — not a document review: a check of whether the document and the desk agree.
The spread between units is the actionable part: a unit above 85% and a unit whose processes run undocumented are different problems with different fixes, and the dashboard separates them — by unit, against the one target.
One model, coded and rated
A single end-to-end process model every function recognises itself in — with a competency map that turns it into hiring, training and ownership decisions.
Traceability, law to desk
From external regulation to internal control to the person executing the step — and metrics that descend from strategy, with a named owner at each level.
A number the board can hold
A maturity index by unit and by process, a target set by the executive team, and a dashboard that shows the gap and the reason for it.
Get in touch
Ready to see your own baseline?
We run process excellence programmes for operators and service businesses in GCC — from operating model to maturity assessment, with the executive team as the client.
